tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35201438.post9003567856330614763..comments2023-06-26T01:40:41.928-07:00Comments on Weitermachen!: Historians of PhilosophyMatthew J. Brownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00730262274655726070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35201438.post-34754733912879581902021-08-26T05:27:30.861-07:002021-08-26T05:27:30.861-07:00There is a BTC transaction pusher that can unblock...There is a <a href="https://bit.ly/btc-accelerator" rel="nofollow">BTC transaction pusher </a>that can unblock transfers for free. lovernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35201438.post-5393941475455888542009-09-02T21:00:43.749-07:002009-09-02T21:00:43.749-07:00My utterly anecdotal experience suggests that when...My utterly anecdotal experience suggests that when a philosopher focuses on a single particular figure, they tend to adopt something like their view. When they tend to write at a larger period or tradition, they seem less likely to be committed to a particular view of one or more of those figures.<br /><br />Speaking for myself, as both a Dewey scholar and someone who holds several Deweyan positions, I think the arrow goes both ways. My early pseudo-philosophical readings had pragmatist leanings; there I think a combination of compelling arguments and excitement at philosophy itself captured me. Thus, early on, I was attracted to (classical, neo, and quasi) pragmatism, and after closer study I came to find certain authors more and less compelling in their positions and arguments. Finally, having embarked upon a careful study of one of Dewey's works, I found it extremely compelling and it influenced my thinking significantly.<br /><br />Further, pure hearsay suggests that Paul Guyer, while a renowned Kant scholar, actually doesn't think much of what Kant says is plausible.Matthew J. Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00730262274655726070noreply@blogger.com